|
Ron Paul:
Hope Defined
By
Elisabeth Higgins
"My van got smashed because of a Ron Paul sign I had in the back window
and it felt good. I wasn’t upset about it at all. They got something out
of the sign so much that they smashed my car," said Leo Kou, a resident
of Chicago’s Northwest suburbs.
After a shopping trip, Kou’s
wife discovered a hole in the van’s rear window that looked like it had
been caused by the force of a baseball bat. The epicenter of the smashed
glass began at the Ron Paul sticker and spider-veined out into thousands
of little pieces in the protective web of shatterproof glass.
Along with the sticker on the
family van, two Ron Paul signs sit on Kou’s front lawn. Over the past
few months, the signs have been saved from the depths of snow drifts
multiple times but have not been the cause of any vandalism.
Ron Paul’s economics-focused
campaign for the Republican presidential nomination has excited
passionate support. The media has shown bits and pieces of the
enthusiasm Paul has stimulated but has not identified the cause or spent
much time looking at this corner of the 2008 presidential primaries.
"The media is not covering
him period," Kou said. "He has to resort to different means. In many
ways, the ‘Ron Paul Revolution’ is the Internet revolution. It shows
people’s voices are being heard despite the media. I think this is a
glimpse of the days coming when the mainstream media will inevitably
lose the edge."
Kou first discovered Ron Paul
when he ran across the candidate’s Website. "I saw his positions and
said, ‘This is amazing! There is no candidate being so frank about where
he stands, sees how the issues are connected and knows what the White
House should do.’"
Paul’s Internet campaigning
has especially touched college students. He has propelled many young
people into political and economic involvement. Of Kou’s four sons, the
three eligible voters have gotten caught up in the "Ron Paul Revolution"
by participating in Facebook groups, discussion boards and prearranged
"money bombs" like the Dec. 16 fund-raiser which garnered a record $6.4
million for the candidate in 24 hours.
Kou was drawn to Paul because
he holds similar perspectives on federal policies. Both believe that the
war, economy, health care and immigration are interrelated. Different,
independent policies cannot be created for each issue. An overall policy
must be developed to address a number of issues that all affect each
other. Both also think that policy should be grounded in history.
"There is no such thing as
truth that is isolated and completely separated from history," Kou said.
"There is always a historical context for everything and that’s what Ron
Paul is bringing out. There is a historical context for the Federal
Reserve Bank, the war and the economy. Our future policy must be
consistent with historical reality. Otherwise, you have nothing but
dreams.
"I think Obama paints a nice
picture of dreams but has yet to define what he means by change and
hope," he continued. "We know exactly what change will take shape and
what hope is with Ron Paul. He’s concrete and consistent. That’s why
people who know what he is saying are wild about supporting him."
Kou’s political perspective
also cannot be separated from his personal history.
"I’ve seen a lot, traveled a
lot," he said. "I think my perspective is a little different than some
Americans."
Chinese by birth, Kou spent
most of his childhood in Japan. In 1970, he came to the United States to
study engineering and business administration at the University of
Michigan .
In 1982, he became a citizen. Now, Kou is an
entrepreneur working as an exporter, and consultant for international
trade and business.
He explained why he believes
the issue of war cannot be separated from the issue of the economy.
The United States cannot have
programs that are not supported economically. He noted that because wars
require so much financial support, empires and nations have risen and
fallen because of overextended finances due to military expenditures.
"The military is probably the
most expensive thing in the economy," Kou said. "That’s why a nation’s
future is dictated by what that nation does with the military. If you
look at the international presence, currency and trade that have
dominated the international scene over the centuries, you will see that
they all started borrowing money to finance the wars before they
collapsed. This includes the Roman Empire, France under Napoleon and the
British Empire.
"There is a lesson you learn.
America is on the very edge of collapsing because war has to be
supported and America does not have money. The treasure chests have been
opened one at a time and we look into them and see nothing. Social
Security funds were always supposedly the most secure funds in the
government. Now, we recognize Social Security has dried up and we have
nothing."
In response to financing a
war, Kou said that governments do three primary things; they can inflate
the economy, borrow money or raise taxes. Right now, the United States
needs billions of dollars every day from foreign countries to keep
afloat. Chunks of the United States, in the form of foreign investments,
are being sold to the United Arab Emirates and China.
Kou said that he was against
the United States going to war with Saddam Hussein and now the only way
to keep the United States safe from attacks by radical fundamentalist
Islam is to pull out American troops.
"They attack us because we
are there," Kou said. "They will not tolerate foreigners occupying their
land and we are helping al-Qaeda convert too many people into radicals."
He believes Paul has a
comprehensive program that recognizes if we rebuild our nation, bring
the troops back, and bring the economy back, Iran will never be able to
attack us.
"We still have the
opportunity to fortify this nation and strengthen the economy and become
an international standard again," he said. "Once we are strong
economically, no county can touch the United States. Because we are so
weak and dependent, we have become totally vulnerable and will lose
control of everything. Whoever controls the international currency
controls the world."
In 1945, the United States
filled the need for an international currency to facilitate
international trade. The dollar became the almighty dollar backed with
gold and silver. The United States agreed to fix the dollar at $35 per
one ounce of gold. Then, the Federal Reserve Bank diluted the dollar.
The correlation between the value of gold and the value of the dollar we
lost and gold prices mounted against the dollar. France and other
nations demanded gold in return for their dollars when they sensed
instability.
In 1971, President Richard
Nixon stopped the exchange of dollars for gold. According to Kou, Nixon
essentially said we have 280 million ounces of gold and we’re not
shipping out any more. Once the gold was disconnected from the U.S.
dollar, it immediately dropped in value and people lost confidence in
it.
"I was born in 1951," Kou
said. "Then, the currency exchange was 360 yen to one dollar. In 1970,
when I came to the United States, it was 360 yen to one dollar. The
dollar was absolutely stable. Everyone trusted the U.S. dollar and it
was freely and securely traded in the international market."
European nations came
together with currency as the driving force. They wanted a formidable
currency to replace the U.S. dollar and to replace the United States as
the international standard.
"You can see how there is a
shifting of power in the world," Kou said. "The power is up for grabs.
As an industrialized nation with technology, resources and people, we
have hope. We just have to stop bleeding and bring the troops back. It
would strengthen us to no end."
Kou, like Paul, considers the
Federal Reserve Bank’s policies to be detrimental to the United States’
economy. The Federal Reserve encourages a credit based economy that
essentially encourages borrowing and discourages investment because,
over time, inflation evaporates all investments.
"The Federal Reserve Bank has
one problem. It exists," he said. "It was created in a top secret
environment. No one knows anything going on behind the scenes. Ron Paul
suggested that they let Congress know their actions. It’s not right for
an unconstitutional institution to have all the power that directly
affects people’s savings and investments."
Kou raised the issue of the
presidential primary process with a sigh. The whole primary system needs
to be changed, said Kou. He sees a need to eliminate the media’s ability
to determine the outcome of elections. Also, because the T.V. and the
Internet allow news to be instantaneous, he believes that when we are
electing the President of the United Stated of America, all voting
should take place at once.
"We have already seen the
evils of this process; how preferential it can all become," he said.
He continued to discuss the
other candidates vying for presidential nomination.
"Nobody knows anything about
[Illinois Sen. Barack] Obama," Kou said. "He is not even an appropriate
candidate for the United States, not because of his race, but because he
is articulating nothing. He gives hope that amounts to no hope…Obama has
no track record. The unknown factor is too risky. Don’t commit the
future into the hands of someone who gives undefined hope.
"I don’t want to see change
for the sake of change. You want to move towards the right direction and
standard. With Ron Paul, it’s the Constitution, but today, that’s
radical."
Sen. Hillary Clinton, of New
York, has a track record, said Kou. He thinks that Bill Clinton did a
lot of damage to foreign policy while he was president and that the
Clintons will bring more foreign investment to the country. While a free
market system is good, government solicited support to keep banks afloat
after the sub-prime mortgages disaster is problematic.
"If you lose control of
banks, you lose control of the security of the nation," he said.
Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee
does not know how to run a war, economy or manage foreign diplomacy, Kou
believes. He sees him as a candidate who would inevitably enlarge
government.
"We need to shrink government
and spend money where it really counts to give strength back to the
people so they have incentives and pride," he said.
"[Arizona Sen. John] McCain
has no clue of the relationship between the economy and war," Kou said.
The United States spends one trillion dollars on the war each year, he
explained, yet McCain says the American people wouldn’t mind staying at
war for a hundred years.
"[Massachusetts Gov.] Mitt
Romney is slick but doesn’t have clear policy," Kou said. "He flip-flops
in huge ways. He was pro-choice when that was the thing to be to get
elected in Massachusetts. Now, he has to be pro-life to win the
Republican nomination. He is opportunistic. He offers about $20 billion
of free money to auto workers in Michigan just to get votes. I have no
respect for a man like that."
Kou explained why he chose to
vote for Ron Paul on Feb. 5.
"Ron Paul is a better candidate because he
has an entirely comprehensive plan," Kou said. "Every issue is related
and integrated. He actually came out and addressed the entire policy for
the good of America. I have been convinced of the United States’
precarious economic position for years but have never seen a solution to
the problems. He addressed them so beautifully. His goal ultimately is
to get government out of the way and give maximum liberty, individual
freedom and financial power back to the people. He is speaking what is
good for America as a public servant who cares about America." |